"Education is basically about engineering learning experiences." (Nathan, p.3)
This quote caused my first stop, as I considered the simple yet complex nature of the statement. Teacher development is about the kinds of learning experiences we present for students. I believe all teachers want to create and present the best learning opportunities for their students, yet what that looks like varies greatly. Herein lies the dilemma of education - about which much is written, argued about and copious resources developed to support the learning of students. How do we engineer the best learning experiences for students? Does this change depend on the time period during which we are teaching or the culture in which we teach? How does the composition of the classroom and the individuals therein (students and teacher) affect the best learning experiences? So many questions... can we even agree on how to define learning? The author of this article includes a definition of learning as "changes in our behaviour." The author goes on to explain that, "a pattern is emerging...that embodied learning is a natural human activity, and it is possible to design for it and harness it in ways that can inform educational practices and policies in order to usher in a new era of educating the embodied mind." (p.5)
Another stop for me (there were many in this article) came with this statement, "Meaning and sense making through personally grounded ways of knowing are not the primary objectives of these scholastic experiences. It justly matches what students most often say when asked what they are doing in school: 'I don't know'." (p.6) It is so true, that many students don't know how to explain what they are learning, and yet isn't it true that to truly understand, one should be able to explain understanding to others?
The last stop I will discuss has to do with assessment. As educators, we often create "restrictive environments" (p.7) to assess students. Does this really allow teachers to develop understanding of what students know? I have recently been experimenting with more open-ended ways of assessing students' knowledge and have come to see that traditional assessments only give us a tiny glimpse of student knowledge, knowledge which may go well beyond what students are able to show in traditional assessment.
As I read this article, I found myself often in agreement with the author. The article discussed the use of cognitive tools, particularly grounding and linking metaphors, based in embodied experiences. Ideas of equity and enthnomathematics were discussed. I have asked lots of questions above, feel free to answer (or add your thoughts about) any of them but I will also end with a final question. How does embodied learning support students in sense-making and meaning-making in mathematics?